I'll be away for a conference and a much needed holiday in a country where they do not enbloc their buildings LOL. I'll try to update the site when I can - a much needed update is about the protocols for the 1st EOGM in light of the new regulations. There's been a lot of feedback from various estates about how confusing the new law is with regards to the first EOGM to elect the SC members (or rather, how vague the law is in procedural terms for the election!). I'll try to compile what other estates have done, were successful in achieving, and what some marketing agents and managing agents have tried to do (pull the wool over owners' eyes, capitalise on the ambiguities to push their agendas, utter confusion over what to do etc).
It's the Wild Wild West out there, ladies and gents. Be careful!
Oh, and I absolutely loved that article about Springwell Mansion in the New Paper (reproduced
here) where the owners who were against the sale paid $60 to put up a banner on the gate saying "No to Enbloc". After all, if the marketing agents can put up massive posters/banners on the estate gates indicating the collective sale, why not minority owners?
Poll's ending soon. Any suggestions for possible polls? Hit me.
Print PageTags: Springwell Mansion, collective sales, Enbloccing Singapore, en bloc, condo, en-bloc, en-bloc sale, collective sale, enbloc, enbloc sale, singapore
